psy.co

2. Improper garbage management

It has also been observed that the trash cans are frequently left open after use. This practice attracts animals, causes unpleasant odors, and compromises the hygiene of the premises. Such management of household waste is incompatible with your duties of normal maintenance and respect for the rented premises as well as the common areas.

Oh! it's illegal that squirrels eat out garbage! Oh no!! Poor them. Dang, we've never put garbage out,

3. Cluttering and improper use of the garage

The garage is currently cluttered with your personal belongings. This clutter demonstrates an improper appropriation of a space that is not leased to you for your exclusive use, and violates both the lease and the rules of the building.

I DO NOT OWN A FUCKING THING IN THE GARAGE LOL. IT'S ALL YOURS NOW. you own the building. You are insane. I'm sorry.

4. Improper use of common outdoor spaces

You are using multiple outdoor areas, specifically the low walls, the areas around the balcony, and certain areas visible from the street, as if they were private spaces reserved exclusively for you. However, these spaces are not leased to you for exclusive use; they must remain accessible and unobstructed for the owner and her daughter. Your behavior has the effect of restricting the enjoyment of these premises by others. [1]

I guess you haven't been here in a while have you? lol. Did you know that I was the person taking care of this entire property for the past 6 years? guess not, eh? lol. Has anyone on earth ever used this property? nope. lol.

I spent 1500 last summer on this property, wanna give it back to me? ;lol guess not eh lol

5. Unlawful appropriation of the garden

The lease clearly stipulates that you have a right of access to the yard, to be shared with the owner, and not an exclusive right. Despite this, you have installed a barbecue, a large table, umbrellas, armchairs, and various personal items in the garden—both under the balcony and on the railings—in a way that practically turns it into a private backyard. This appropriation of a shared-use space infringes upon my right to normal enjoyment of the garden and goes against the stipulations of the lease.

Oh, shit, I forgot it's illegal to put my barbaque where the original owner of this building told me to put it. LOL. The owner who signed the lease is dead, chick. the previous owner lives in Beaconsfield lol. Not an exclusive right? huh? the lease says we share the back yard. that is a legal statement. you sound like a Trumper lol.

Couldn't you have just offered me some money so you didn't have to prove to the world that you're insane?

...kinda sad to me.
and to your kids.

6. Presence of a dog in violation of the lease

The lease expressly provides that the tenant does not have the right to keep one or more animals. Despite this clause, you keep a huge dog, of the Saint-Bernard type, which is undeclared and unauthorized, and roams freely in the garden. This situation is the result of a false declaration made at the time of the conclusion or renewal of the lease and the purchase of my duplex, and constitutes a serious breach of your contractual obligations, in addition to infringing upon the peaceful enjoyment and cleanliness of the premises. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Omg, Nova roams freely in the garden? oh no.

8. Damages caused to the dwelling

Regarding damages to the dwelling, you are specifically accused of damaging a window frame through the installation and use of your air conditioner, which caused water infiltration, wood deterioration, and damages that must be repaired up to standard. In addition, there is a door with a broken glass pane; you had committed to having this repair carried out, which has not been done to date. These damages, which you acknowledged and which were documented during our visits, occurred under your responsibility and remain uncorrected.

When you visited this buillding, I showed you everything the owner didn't fix, that I fixed shit he didn't fix, and I showed you what we broke. It's all fixed now and the previous owner said he would pay for it but didn't.

Fuck him, he's an asshole too.

Fuck the world lady.

The broken glass pane on the door was fixed weeks ago, its in the garage. Did you look at it? Nope.

Been here 15 years, what have you not broken in the last 15 years? LOL

9. False statements and insurance

You did not declare to me that you own a dog, As a result, I was unable to properly inform my home insurance provider, who established my policy on the basis of a "non-smoking" and "pet-free" building. This situation creates a serious risk to the validity and extent of my insurance coverage and constitutes a serious breach of your obligations of loyalty and cooperation toward the landlord. I also remind you that, despite my repeated requests, you have still not provided me with a copy of your tenant insurance, as provided for during the renewal of your lease for the current year.

Why the fuck would i declare we own a dog? You think I wanted my rent to double since I don't have a job? LOL.

Do I give a fuck about your home insurance? LOL.
MY obligations? LOL. You're supposed to give me money to move out during asbestos removal.
I'm guessing you finally learned this last week, which is why you haven't started yet LOL.

The previous owner has my insurance form, did he give it to you? Nope. Do I legally need to give it to you before July 1?
nope. you have it now.

10. Absence of acquired rights related to the tolerance of the former owner
Well if you would have just offered me 50% of our rent for a few months, maybe we would have stayed lol.

I wish to clarify that the previous owner allegedly allowed you to use the garden as a private backyard for your current purposes. I remind you that the tolerance of a former owner does not modify the contents of the lease, does not create any acquired rights (grandfathered rights), and cannot establish in your favour a right of exclusive use of the outdoor spaces.

11. Inspection and renovation mortgage

You sent me a letter saying it was starting in June.

Hasn't started yet ha ha LOLLLLLLLLL

Following the offer to purchase, a full professional inspection was carried out in your presence. This inspection highlighted the need for major work, which forced us to take the necessary steps to obtain a renovation mortgage, as the scale of the work exceeded our immediate financial means. These steps were required by the financial institution and were carried out transparently. Their sole purpose was to restore the building to proper condition and to satisfy our legal obligations regarding health and safety, without infringing upon your rights as a tenant. As owner...

As owner, I have the legal obligation to ensure the sanitation, safety, and good condition of the building.

And, you also have legal obligation to pay us to be out during asbestos removal and pay us to move eventually. But nope, you'd rather be a bitch. Even the real estate agent confirmed you were a bitch.

Sorry you bought an old building.

FORMAL NOTICE (MISE EN DEMEURE)
Consequently, in view of the foregoing, you are hereby formally ordered to:

Remove all of your objects and bulky items from the outdoor and common spaces, including those under the balcony, on the low walls, and near the trash cans. Cost me 800 bucks, can you e-transfer it please?
Ensure that the trash cans are systematically closed. LOL
Completely clear the garage of your personal belongings. Been done since 2025... lol
Stop using the common spaces as if they were private spaces. ? You gonna mow the lawn tomorrow?
Remove the barbecue, table, umbrellas, armchairs, and any other personal items from the garden and the railings. From your balcony. Done. Cost me 800 bucks, remember?
Stop letting your dog roam in the garden and take the necessary steps to comply with the lease clause prohibiting animals. She doesn't "roam" in the garden, she just poops in the garden. No more poop, all gone. Oh, and, It was ME who has been taking care of this property for over 5 years remember? LOL. Remember when the previous owner destroyed the lawn? Remember when I bought everything required to re-plant the grass and watered it every day? Oh sorry, you don't remember. All good.
Stop all tobacco and cannabis consumption in the common areas and near the windows, so as not to inconvenience the other occupants. which occupants? me?
Repair, at your expense, the window frame damaged by the installation of the air conditioner. Nope, the previous owner said he is paying. but i texted him asked for the 288, but he did not reply. fuck him. Could you imagine never doing one thing in 15 years and then selling a building for a million bucks that hasn't had a mortgage since 1952, and then not paying 2 hundred and 88 dollars to someone?
Repair, at your expense, the broken glass of the door in question. i told Jose it's done. I'm guessing she didn't tell you cause she hates you lol.
Fully comply with the clauses of your lease and the rules of the building, including the immediate submission of proof of your current tenant insurance. Sent in March. Nick hates you too LOL. (sorry)
You have a period of ten (10) days from the receipt of this letter to comply with all of these requirements and to provide me with written proof thereof (photos, invoices, certificates, etc.). uhhhhh, no, sorry, that's BS. seems you have never been an owner before....
Failing full compliance within the prescribed timeframe, I will file, without further notice, an application before the Tribunal administratif du logement seeking, notably, the termination of your lease, the issuance of the necessary orders, the payment of damages, if applicable, and any other remedy deemed appropriate. Go ahead! please. :) i'll fucking get money. lol.

You have a period of ten (10) days from the receipt of this letter to comply with all of these requirements and to provide me with written proof thereof (photos, invoices, certificates, etc.).

Failing full compliance within the prescribed timeframe, I will file, without further notice, an application before the Tribunal administratif du logement seeking, notably, the termination of your lease, the issuance of the necessary orders, the payment of damages, if applicable, and any other remedy deemed appropriate. [1]

This letter is made without prejudice and under full reserve of my rights, remedies, and claims, both contractual and legal. This formal notice shall serve as all required legal notices.

Please accept, Madam, the expression of my highest consideration.

Psy.co

Owner of the duplex and occupant of dwelling 5325

LETTER TWO:

We confirm that we accept the termination of the lease, but no compensation will be paid. This is not a renoviction.

You should know that the minimum legal notice period for a repossession is six months. We provided the form to Ms. Pothier out of pure courtesy, in order to facilitate communication and avoid any confusion. Ms. Pothier has also signed the official form from the Tribunal administratif du logement (TAL), which unequivocally confirms the expiry date of the lease and the family nature of the project. After indicating that she found the notice "too early," she took the form with her for consideration, then returned to slip the signed document under our door a few minutes later, of her own free will, on June 8, 2026. Apparently it's illegal for you to ask me to leave over a year in advance of the end of my lease.

The early termination of a lease normally incurs penalties payable by the tenant. We exceptionally agree to waive them. There is therefore no question of assuming moving expenses. fuck you. all my neighbours have paid people to leave.

Essential work must begin quickly. It will start in July and cannot be postponed, given the condition of the building and the damage already caused by the complete disconnection of the heating system. Sorry, nothing is mandatorily required.

Aware of the specific context of July 1st moves in Montreal, we take note that Ms. Pothier proposes to leave on October 1st. However, this date does not correspond to the expiry of her lease, which remains fixed at June 30, 2027. She can therefore remain until this expiry date if she wishes. WHY the fuck would I stay in a building with you? lol

However, if she prefers to leave before June 30, 2027 — whether on October 1st or an earlier date — it is essential that she clearly communicate the chosen date to us. A sudden departure is impossible: major works require strict planning, safety measures, and coordination with multiple stakeholders. Such information cannot, therefore, be provided at the last minute, as the work will begin regardless.
LOLLLLLLLLLL your are a moron, it's the other fucking way around. It's YOU that required strict planning, safety measures and notifying us far in advance. Do you think WE give a FUCK about you renovating this building? LOL

We must also emphasize that the delays caused by the uncertainty surrounding Ms. Pothier's departure date are causing us to incur significant additional costs. LOL The specialized contractors we have retained are in high demand and require clear dates to maintain their availability. We have had to put several already scheduled interventions on hold, resulting in additional costs, notably for storage, the extension of our temporary housing, and delays for Ms. Lallemand in resuming her in-person work in Montreal.

BS. You don't have a permit yet, do you?

These damages stem directly from Ms. Pothier's sudden decision to question what had already been agreed upon, informed, and organized, which delayed the ongoing procedures and made the continuation of normal work planning impossible.

You will also understand that the demand for $2,000 is unacceptable, as it has no legal basis, and while we are showing good faith by accepting the options proposed by Ms. Pothier and waiving the normally applicable penalties. Absolutely legal basis, fucking moron.

We will not detail here the shortcomings already set out in our explanatory letter, although these are serious, documented, and perfectly well-founded in law. Ms. Pothier already benefits from great leniency on our part, but we will not, however, waste any more time trying to resolve a situation that should be simple, legal, and handled in good faith. We note, moreover, that your response does not address any of these shortcomings, even though they are essential to the case. Oh don't worry, you wasted alot of time writing these letters and making your son in law send them lol.

We also recall that several repairs must imperatively be carried out before Ms. Pothier's departure. yes, i'm leaving in august, all done. ya gotta shut up.

It is not only a matter of finalizing the repairs already started, but indeed of proceeding with all the corrective measures we have requested, notably: the repair of the wooden door whose glass was broken, as well as the restoration of the window frame damaged by an air conditioner that caused water infiltration and wood rot. Ms. Pothier and her daughter have acknowledged their responsibility for these damages. Lucky you that I was nice LOL. You think the TAL would igve a fuck about any of these things? LOL. yes i'm a moron, should not have said a fucking word. (facepalm)

Failing to carry out these repairs, compensation corresponding to the actual costs must be paid. The dwelling must be returned in good condition, in accordance with lease obligations. 15 years later, ummmm, nope.

We also recall that tenant transparency is one of the assessment criteria used by the Tribunal administratif du logement (TAL). While not explicitly provided for by law, TAL case law recognizes that hiding relevant information, providing contradictory versions, or misleading the landlord constitutes a breach of the obligations of good faith and cooperation. These elements are systematically taken into account by the Tribunal when evaluating the conduct of the parties.

Finally, since Ms. Pothier has indicated her intention to remain for several more months, she must provide proof of her civil liability insurance without delay, which is a contractual requirement of the lease. The absence of this proof constitutes a serious breach, particularly in a context where damage has already been caused to the dwelling. I sent it to Neil in february. kiss his cock and get it from him.

We finally recall that all repairs already raised before our taking possession on June 3, 2026, must be settled one way or another, as she had promised. These corrective measures cannot be ignored or postponed, since they stem directly from Ms. Pothier's occupancy of the premises and fall under her rental obligations. no legal requirements for me to fix it in ten days.

To:
Me Daniel Crespo Villarreal

Subject: 5327, av. Earnscliffe, Montréal (H3X 2P8) – Your letter of June 27, 2026

Counsel,

I, the undersigned Achraf Zineddine, acting as proxy for Ms. Yasmina Lallemand, acknowledge receipt of your letter of today’s date, Saturday, June 27, 2026.

You indicate that a difference of interpretation persists and suggest consulting a legal advisor. For our part, we have already set out in detail the facts, the applicable obligations, and the difficulties encountered in our previous letters, without the points raised receiving any precise response from you.

Regarding the date of September 1, 2026
You indicate that the date of September 1, 2026, was agreed upon. This is incorrect. At no point was this date discussed, negotiated, or accepted. Furthermore, you seem to assume that asbestos removal cannot be undertaken before your client's departure.

We have always been clear: the envisioned agreement relied exclusively on the commencement of the work, and not on a unilaterally imposed date. Without the commencement of the work, we have no interest in terminating the lease.

Regarding the concerns raised by your client
Your client raises concerns, but she has not taken any concrete steps to inquire about or verify anything whatsoever. She:

has not consulted any resource,

has not asked any question,

has not requested any document,

has not carried out any factual verification with the specialized company, which is nevertheless duly certified and authorized.

Her concerns are therefore not based on any real facts, even though all necessary information has been provided to her.

Regarding the allegedly completed corrective measures
You write that "most of the requested corrective measures have already been made." However, we have received no detailed list nor any proof (photos, invoices, or certificates) relating to the repairs we expressly mentioned, notably:

the glass door,

the damaged window frame,

as well as the other corrective measures you claim to have completed.

Likewise, proof of Ms. Pothier's civil liability insurance, requested on multiple occasions, has still not been sent to us.

What we expect now
At this stage, what we need is not new general formulations, but:

a clear response to the demands already formulated in our letters;

concrete supporting documents for the corrective measures you claim have been completed;

an agreed departure date, formalized in a signed document, and not simply announced unilaterally.

In the spirit of remaining constructive, we therefore invite you to review our previous correspondence, to answer it point by point, and to send us the required proof and confirmations.

Failing this, it will be difficult to consider the situation truly resolved, and it will then be up to the Tribunal administratif du logement to decide.

Please accept, Counsel, the expression of my highest consideration.

Achraf Zineddine
Proxy for Ms. Yasmina Lallemand

Hello,

This is in response to your correspondence below.

I would like to reiterate my suggestion regarding consulting a professional. Dialogue proves to be difficult in the absence of a shared understanding of everyone's rights and obligations. Unfortunately, your numerous and voluminous communications contain several errors and essentially constitute a series of weakly founded threats, or even an abuse of rights regarding your correspondence of June 22.

To re-establish the facts: your notice of repossession was premature (and not late) and the tenant only acknowledged receipt of it (and did not accept the process). In the absence of her acceptance, you must send a new notice and then apply to the TAL for authorization to proceed with the repossession. Should the Tribunal authorize it, it will grant moving compensation to the tenant (which has nothing to do with a "renoviction").

It was therefore with a view to avoiding debates on these issues that I sent you a settlement offer in my very first communication, to which you responded only with demands, threats, and formal notices.

Furthermore, I ask that you do not attribute intentions or statements to me that I did not make. In your letter of June 25, you explicitly confirm that you accept the termination of the lease, following which you invite us to communicate the date to you and insist on the importance of knowing it as soon as possible. Consequently, two days later, we communicated the date of September 1, 2026, to you. Therefore, we consider this date to be effective; the tenant will vacate the premises on that date. You are free to send us a form that will reassure you to this effect.

As for the repairs attributable to the tenant, she has until her departure to comply. We reiterate that our client is aware of her obligations in this regard and intends to comply with them. You remain free to take whatever steps you deem necessary thereafter. Should your claims prove to be abusive, we will vigorously contest them.

Finally, regarding the work, we deplore the attempt to blame the delays on our client, when nothing stands in the way of its commencement. On the contrary, we note that the dates you initially stated were not respected, even though you will have possession of the entire building in a few weeks. Consequently, we respectfully invite you to cease your untimely communications, failing which we will consider any recurrence as an act of harassment and will act accordingly.

Sincerely,

Daniel Crespo Villarreal, B.A., LL.B., LL.M.
Avocat | Lawyer

5159 boul. Saint-Laurent

Montréal QC H2T 1R9
T : (438) 800-1113
F : (514) 277-4069
dcrespo@dcvlegal.ca

Her letter she signed:

June 30:

MUTUAL AGREEMENT FOR LEASE TERMINATION BETWEEN THE UNDERSIGNED:

The landlord:
Yasmina Lallemand
Residing at: 5325 avenue Earnscliffe - Montréal H3X 2P8
AND
The tenant:
Madame Louise Marie Pothier
Currently residing at: 5327 avenue Earnscliffe - Montréal H3X 2P8

THE PARTIES AGREE TO AND SIGN THE FOLLOWING:

Termination of lease: The landlord and the tenant mutually agree to definitively terminate the lease for the dwelling located at 5327 avenue Earnscliffe – Montréal H3X 2P8.
Departure date: The end of the lease is fixed for September 1, 2026. The tenant firmly undertakes to definitively vacate the premises, empty the dwelling of all her belongings, and hand over the keys to the landlord at the latest by this date.
Compliance with conditions: This termination is made in accordance with the conditions set out in the landlord's letter dated June 29, 2026, formally accepted by the tenant's lawyer, Me Daniel Crespo Villarreal, on the same day.
Inspection and walk-through: The parties agree to jointly conduct an inspection of the dwelling at the latest by September 1, 2026, in order to draw up a walk-through report. The dwelling must be handed over clean, empty, and free of all clutter. Any abnormal damage noted during this inspection and caused by the tenant shall be at her exclusive expense.
Legal scope: The parties recognize that this agreement is final, enforceable, and that it legally binds the signatories under article 1974.1 and following of the Civil Code of Québec.

Lawyer said to me:

Hello,

Their agreement contains some errors that suggest it was generated using artificial intelligence, but nothing that is prejudicial to you.

Its contents appear to be consistent with the agreement that was reached. You may sign it if you wish, but the agreement has already been concluded, so your signature is optional.

It is worth noting that it specifies that the move-out inspection will be conducted jointly, which had not been discussed previously. That said, if there is nothing of concern to note, this should not cause any issues.

Regards,

Daniel Crespo Villarreal, B.A., LL.B., LL.M.

I did not sign.

Je comprends de votre courriel que votre cliente accepte les conditions convenues relativement à son départ du logement et qu’elle libérera les lieux le 1er septembre 2026, conformément à l’entente intervenue entre les parties dans votre courriel du 29 juin 2026.

Je vous remercie de bien vouloir me confirmer que cette compréhension est exacte.